205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-70.63%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 51.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.29%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -53.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-12.20%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -32.51%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.28%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 2.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -404.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
102.19%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AMD's 257.32%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-34.43%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 5.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
26.20%
CapEx growth well above AMD's 6.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
56.46%
Purchases well above AMD's 91.51%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
30.23%
At 50-75% of AMD's 48.72%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -99.37%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-34.55%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 193.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-35.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -34.05%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-63.45%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.