205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.22%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.80%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.03%
Less D&A growth vs. AMD's 3.82%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
70.93%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -233.99%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-153.57%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 137.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
60.21%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -228.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
686.67%
Well above AMD's 933.33%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
62.09%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -1648.78%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.79%
Lower CapEx growth vs. AMD's 29.35%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. AMD's 1200.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-74.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -383.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
51.73%
Below 50% of AMD's 194.92%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 125.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-188.64%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 11.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.86%
We slightly raise equity while AMD is negative at -46.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
13.42%
Buyback growth of 13.42% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.