205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-84.11%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 70.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-18.09%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -7.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
113.04%
Well above AMD's 27.47% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.20%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -294.62%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.50%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -40.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -105.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-23.53%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -124.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-77.55%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -56.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
44.16%
CapEx growth well above AMD's 25.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.97%
Purchases growth of 83.97% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
287.30%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -91.89%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.52%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -450.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.00%
Issuance growth of 20.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
73.83%
Buyback growth of 73.83% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.