PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 59.70%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-1.72%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1083.33%
Well above AMD's 125.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-2.13%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -10.53%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-68.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -127.13%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-60.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -192.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-243.24%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -147.83%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.00%
Growth well above AMD's 44.44%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-160.00%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -381.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
49.73%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.39%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-370.83%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 13.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-154.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 10.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-73.59%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 77.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-769.01%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 30.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.95%
Issuance growth of 78.95% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-0.40%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.