205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-29.30%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 36.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -1.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
121.68%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AMD's 400.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
21.28%
SBC growth well above AMD's 22.73%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-268.71%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 49.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-118.57%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 58.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-73.63%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -60.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-239.39%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 99.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.00%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -912.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-58.05%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 21.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
35.55%
CapEx growth of 35.55% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-24.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 18.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
153.36%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 2.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 98.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
111.50%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 86.41%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.95%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. AMD's 50.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-28.50%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.