205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
75.78%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -524.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
466.67%
Well above AMD's 75.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-221.88%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
110.78%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -252.94%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
111.92%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -72.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
215.63%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 135.74%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
3.85%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -1864.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
17.28%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AMD's 350.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-48.98%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -37.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
78.07%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -396.30%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-2.74%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 17.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-257.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 55.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-78.12%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 4.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-548.91%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 96.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
13.04%
We repay more while AMD is negative at -48500.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-7.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.