205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
37.12%
Net income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 69.13%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-1.26%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
120.83%
Deferred tax of 120.83% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
17.19%
SBC growth well above AMD's 4.35%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-153.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -284.34%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-129.40%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -126.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-37.36%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -128.42%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-209.91%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 92.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-292.59%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -541.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
99.15%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AMD's 278.57%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-66.82%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 45.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
12.50%
CapEx growth well above AMD's 9.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.91%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -85.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
9.86%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -2.72%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.64%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -12.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
241.35%
We slightly raise equity while AMD is negative at -50.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-13.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.