205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 164.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.96%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -3.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
155.56%
Deferred tax of 155.56% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-5.33%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 15.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
131.94%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -102.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
81.25%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -712.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
70.00%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -117.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
52.78%
Lower AP growth vs. AMD's 115.65%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
261.70%
Growth well above AMD's 277.50%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
833.33%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -237.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
70.77%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 160.00%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-27.84%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 46.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
27.84%
Acquisition growth of 27.84% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
58.49%
Purchases well above AMD's 40.82%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-69.92%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 9.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-24.74%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 1800.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-168.39%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 351.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
1.75%
Issuance growth of 1.75% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-1.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.