205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.76%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 85.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.67%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -5.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
73.33%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AMD's 200.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-7.04%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 4.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
242.42%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -61.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1160.00%
AR growth well above AMD's 120.69%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
16.67%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 118.01%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
176.47%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -86.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-91.45%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -474.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-390.91%
Negative yoy while AMD is 154.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
4.17%
CFO growth of 4.17% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
13.71%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -40.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-13.71%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.81%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AMD's 75.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
0.15%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -0.27%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
35.54%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AMD's 456.14%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
41.98%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 59.14%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.86%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.