205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -122.47%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.08%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -1.85%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-171.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 1400.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
18.18%
SBC growth while AMD is negative at -4.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-214.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -81.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-146.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -119.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
440.00%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -63.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1000.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -475.76%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-1161.54%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 40.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
117.19%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -66.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-61.47%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -1071.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.04%
CapEx growth of 28.04% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-43.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -434.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
14.60%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -46.67%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
148.72%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -134.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-147.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -144.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.45%
Issuance growth of 68.45% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
1.91%
Buyback growth of 1.91% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.