205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.48%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 50.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.95%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -4.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-95.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
30.00%
SBC growth well above AMD's 6.25%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-265.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -175.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-169.06%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -69.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-81.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -102.82%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-460.00%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-400.00%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 35.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
96.35%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -70.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-52.12%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -249.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.60%
CapEx growth of 1.60% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
64.25%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -54.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
29.47%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 10.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
103.45%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -89.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
132.18%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -134.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to AMD's 98.61%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
75.71%
Issuance growth of 75.71% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.01%
Buyback growth of 4.01% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.