205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.10%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -0.56%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.69%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -2.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-5800.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
7.69%
SBC growth of 7.69% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
46.99%
Less working capital growth vs. AMD's 142.64%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
74.03%
AR growth well above AMD's 80.43%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
31.67%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -1750.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
68.52%
AP growth well above AMD's 130.65%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-12.90%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
471.43%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -91.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
34.65%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of AMD's 66.47%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-1.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 22.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 98.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
39.84%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 0.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-11600.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 3157.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-210.13%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 1506.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.27%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
2.39%
Buyback growth of 2.39% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.