PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -8.84%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.06%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -6.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
12.28%
Deferred tax of 12.28% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-21.43%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -23.53%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
231.82%
Well above AMD's 16.36% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-17.50%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -57.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
378.05%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 121.62%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-41.18%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -68.42%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
358.10%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -115.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-23.08%
Negative yoy while AMD is 216.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.83%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -1.72%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-11.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -47.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
11.20%
Acquisition growth of 11.20% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
50.05%
Purchases well above AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
13.95%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-14.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -96.49%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
323.56%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -108.06%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-31.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -200.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-20.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.