205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.76%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 48.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-8.42%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -19.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
202.00%
Deferred tax of 202.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-12.12%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 23.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
51.38%
Well above AMD's 75.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
776.60%
AR growth well above AMD's 231.43%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-29.82%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 241.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
104.17%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -783.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-85.61%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 42.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1175.00%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -136.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
1.49%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 189.83%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-17.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -28.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
17.99%
Acquisition growth of 17.99% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-129.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-55.41%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
56.06%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-273.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -88.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-33.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
214.29%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. AMD's 500.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
20.63%
Buyback growth of 20.63% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.