205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.56%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 163.30%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.81%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-345.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.56%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 12.50%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
101.29%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -452.63%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
24.00%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -730.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
37.72%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -2400.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
137.50%
Lower AP growth vs. AMD's 1137.04%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
177.03%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -770.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-60.32%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -14800.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
63.71%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -102.38%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 19.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-396.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
34.44%
Liquidation growth of 34.44% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-4966.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-88.66%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 1365.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.82%
Issuance growth of 183.82% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
16.35%
Buyback growth of 16.35% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.