205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.26%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -688.41%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.07%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-111.86%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 2690.91%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-26.32%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 27.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4400.00%
Well above AMD's 200.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-28.95%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 118.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
195.77%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 59.42%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-76.92%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -136.43%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
155.26%
Growth well above AMD's 245.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-72.00%
Negative yoy while AMD is 103.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
32.18%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 134.12%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
12.03%
Lower CapEx growth vs. AMD's 57.14%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-12.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -101.42%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
1.51%
Purchases growth of 1.51% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-57.44%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
7.89%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AMD's 500.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-1027.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -103.04%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while AMD is negative at -26750.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-20.21%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 33200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
5.12%
Buyback growth of 5.12% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.