205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.16%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 87.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-4.22%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
66.40%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -97.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-14.29%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 26.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
1.48%
Less working capital growth vs. AMD's 140.30%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
269.39%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. AMD's 961.29%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-73.53%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 175.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
555.56%
AP growth well above AMD's 8.82%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-89.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -157.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-2485.71%
Negative yoy while AMD is 40.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-1.84%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 548.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
20.86%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -133.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-20.86%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-36.20%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
48.54%
Liquidation growth of 48.54% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
15.71%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -125.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-13.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -160.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.15%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
5.00%
Buyback growth of 5.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.