205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 543.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -33.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-28.00%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 20.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
140.76%
Well above AMD's 36.84% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
19.70%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -30.83%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
137.50%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 550.00%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
291.67%
AP growth well above AMD's 110.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
205.85%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -30.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-110.00%
Negative yoy while AMD is 140.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
87.79%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 180.49%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-23.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -183.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.18%
Acquisition growth of 23.18% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-7.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.27%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -37.96%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-32.87%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6000.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -58.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-9.52%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.