PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 43.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.75%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -4.55%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
103.23%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
5.71%
SBC growth well above AMD's 3.13%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
132.91%
Well above AMD's 4.31% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
44.89%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -33.80%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
40.21%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -66.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
111.76%
AP growth well above AMD's 79.49%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
306.80%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AMD's 818.18%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
17.65%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -27.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
64.21%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 47.67%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-31.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 6.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-5.50%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5975.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -266.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-130.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -69.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-16.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.