PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.74%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -12.07%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.29%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -2.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-37.84%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
94.19%
Well above AMD's 58.20% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
64.95%
AR growth well above AMD's 76.58%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
55.17%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 134.29%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
750.00%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -82.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1.97%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -136.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
95.24%
Well above AMD's 50.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
15.33%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 311.11%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-48.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 23.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
48.59%
Acquisition growth of 48.59% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-155.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.73%
Liquidation growth of 24.73% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-58.02%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2082.72%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 89.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to AMD's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-46.08%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-17.88%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.