PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -62.75%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.47%
D&A growth well above AMD's 4.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
55.77%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -166.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-8.70%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
104.98%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -23.53%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1211.76%
AR growth well above AMD's 40.45%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-288.46%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -991.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-125.49%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 616.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
13.87%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -40.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1150.00%
Well above AMD's 591.67%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
1.85%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -26.32%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.70%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -24.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-12.70%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
89.25%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -680.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
26.12%
Liquidation growth of 26.12% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
15.36%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AMD's 102.86%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
185.12%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -375.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.91%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-67.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.