PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.23%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 118.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.49%
Less D&A growth vs. AMD's 52.17%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
675.00%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -85.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
9.84%
SBC growth well above AMD's 9.76%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
139.52%
Well above AMD's 62.13% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.01%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -1760.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-39.53%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 45.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
61.19%
AP growth well above AMD's 52.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
154.92%
Growth well above AMD's 188.54%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-320.00%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -25.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
62.24%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of AMD's 114.08%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-13.15%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 6.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.40%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-87.37%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -45.16%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-1890.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 88.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-121.99%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 95.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x AMD's 57.32%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-3.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
25.09%
Buyback growth of 25.09% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.