205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.20%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 242.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.00%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -1.43%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-112.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 3200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.36%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
24.31%
Well above AMD's 42.97% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
266.67%
AR growth well above AMD's 35.48%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-25.00%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 58.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
211.54%
AP growth well above AMD's 113.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-40.30%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -95.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
141.82%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -133.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
10.91%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 680.00%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
47.54%
CapEx growth well above AMD's 5.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-47.54%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-312.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.00%
Below 50% of AMD's 223.53%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
32.42%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AMD's 119.61%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-254.26%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 914.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.88%
Issuance growth of 32.88% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
47.16%
Buyback growth of 47.16% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.