PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.91%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 41.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.09%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 5.80%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1350.00%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -106.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-14.58%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 5.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.22%
Well above AMD's 95.89% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
248.05%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -675.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 6800.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
8.75%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -3800.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-195.65%
Negative yoy while AMD is 7550.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-11.95%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 88.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.40%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 23.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
9.40%
Acquisition growth of 9.40% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-109.94%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
38.64%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -90.30%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-5.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -85.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-110.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -145.61%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.26%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-7.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.