PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 148.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.40%
Less D&A growth vs. AMD's 13.41%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-70.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 400.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-27.54%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-630.56%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -267.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-254.29%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -237.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
148.12%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 111.94%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-117.81%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 5.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
40.91%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -845.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.00%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -11.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-16.10%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 39.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-12.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 18.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
12.31%
Acquisition growth of 12.31% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-920.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-71.82%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-28.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -963.64%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-252.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -1425.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
41.38%
Issuance growth of 41.38% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
98.30%
Buyback growth of 98.30% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.