205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.85%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -68.84%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.82%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 5.94%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
136.36%
Well above AMD's 105.97% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
45.24%
SBC growth well above AMD's 7.59%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-179.62%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 128.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-672.73%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -264.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-44.44%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -137.38%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
2200.00%
AP growth well above AMD's 173.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-204.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -109.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
97.80%
Well above AMD's 23.53%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-12.94%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 62.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-45.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 10.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-18.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -168.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
26.02%
Below 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
91.81%
Growth well above AMD's 100.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-11.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -145.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-10.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
71.93%
Issuance growth of 71.93% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-566.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.