205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.81%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.53%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-15.81%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 19.64%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-133.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 91.07%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -83.63%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
22.58%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -136.27%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-261.54%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 62.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-254.29%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 52.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-49.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -115.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
40.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AMD's 118.33%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-2.92%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -3.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-163.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -1.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-86.01%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-118.37%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 79.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
105.93%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -67.66%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
94.86%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -550.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-152.15%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 110.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
63.21%
Debt repayment growth of 63.21% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-30.67%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-2.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 18.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.