PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.95%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -19.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.47%
Less D&A growth vs. AMD's 368.66%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.00%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -419.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
48.00%
SBC growth well above AMD's 77.68%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-572.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 18.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-95.83%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -39.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-219.15%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
120.37%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -98.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-181.37%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 205.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-500.00%
Negative yoy while AMD is 1227.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.04%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
65.44%
CapEx growth well above AMD's 17.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-97.06%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-7.87%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 35.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.44%
Below 50% of AMD's 285.60%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
50.00%
Growth well above AMD's 88.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
25.17%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 34988.89%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
9.62%
Issuance growth of 9.62% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-314.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -151.16%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.