205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.17%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -85.23%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
9.17%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -1.08%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
78.57%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -157.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-20.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -5.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
126.17%
Well above AMD's 120.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
137.97%
AR growth well above AMD's 17.15%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-47.48%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -191.53%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
121.05%
Lower AP growth vs. AMD's 3162.50%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
227.40%
Growth well above AMD's 329.01%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
83.24%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AMD's 2959.57%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
56.45%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -7.03%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-32.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 6.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-76.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -242.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-27.79%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -52.14%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-112.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -266.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-272.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -39.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-39.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 68.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
39.29%
Issuance growth of 39.29% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
15.74%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.15%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.