205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.78%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 123.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.31%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -2.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-41.41%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-13.92%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 5.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4766.67%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -48.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1045.00%
AR growth well above AMD's 56.80%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
49.16%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -22.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-137.04%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 66.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
15.66%
Growth well above AMD's 23.64%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
112.12%
Growth of 112.12% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
-0.67%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -9.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
23.21%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -12.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-400.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -735.71%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
16.72%
Purchases well above AMD's 17.34%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
18.23%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AMD's 10.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-20.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 40.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
81.64%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 47.06%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.82%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-41.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 65.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.