205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -81.56%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.42%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -1.70%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
49.29%
Well above AMD's 69.86% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
55.88%
SBC growth while AMD is negative at -0.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-227.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 38.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-38.62%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 205.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
7.69%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -491.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-670.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -251.38%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-261.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -123.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1650.00%
Negative yoy while AMD is 286.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-47.14%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 36.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-8.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -2.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
6500.00%
Acquisition spending well above AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-89.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -5.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-22.87%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -46.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-566.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-970.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -190.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-57.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
44.44%
Issuance growth of 44.44% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
95.38%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x AMD's 52.16%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.