205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 115.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.25%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -1.85%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-19.72%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9.43%
SBC growth while AMD is negative at -6.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
108.15%
Well above AMD's 20.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-134.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -310.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
72.62%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 7.07%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
232.47%
AP growth well above AMD's 144.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
96.78%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AMD's 275.53%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
102.42%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -134.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
54.47%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AMD's 13.82%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
14.74%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -8.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-98.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
56.87%
Purchases well above AMD's 69.52%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
18.97%
Below 50% of AMD's 71.78%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
175.00%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -2866.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.00%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 385.93%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
89.93%
Debt repayment growth of 89.93% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
281.54%
Issuance growth of 281.54% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2266.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -237.59%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.