205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-185.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AVGO at -9.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
10.42%
Some D&A expansion while AVGO is negative at -0.37%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-133.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AVGO stands at 17.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.46%
Well above AVGO's 18.76% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.63%
Inventory growth well above AVGO's 26.35%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.45%
Growth well above AVGO's 68.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
138.10%
Some yoy increase while AVGO is negative at -33.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
392.44%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVGO's 7.23%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
62.00%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -44.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.35%
Negative yoy purchasing while AVGO stands at 45.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
16.62%
Below 50% of AVGO's 333.33%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.91%
Investing outflow well above AVGO's 23.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.14%
Issuance growth of 7.14% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2057.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -107.07%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.