PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
134.01%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -9.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-12.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AVGO at -0.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-112.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AVGO stands at 17.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-262.81%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AVGO is 18.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-378.79%
Negative yoy inventory while AVGO is 26.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.29%
Negative yoy usage while AVGO is 68.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-88.30%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -33.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-73.66%
Negative yoy CFO while AVGO is 7.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
44.07%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -44.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.68%
Negative yoy purchasing while AVGO stands at 45.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
318.88%
Similar to AVGO's 333.33%. Walter Schloss finds parallel timing in investment disposals or maturities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.42%
Investing outflow well above AVGO's 23.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.23%
Negative yoy issuance while AVGO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
33.33%
We have some buyback growth while AVGO is negative at -107.07%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.