205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
52.55%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -9.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.55%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AVGO at -0.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-370.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AVGO stands at 17.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Well above AVGO's 18.76% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth while AVGO is negative at -9.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
1333.33%
Inventory growth well above AVGO's 26.35%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with AVGO at -354.36%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
67.36%
Growth well above AVGO's 68.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
1125.00%
Some yoy increase while AVGO is negative at -33.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
58.13%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVGO's 7.23%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
7.22%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -44.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.02%
Purchases well above AVGO's 45.71%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-1.00%
We reduce yoy sales while AVGO is 333.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-130.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -176.92%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
348.32%
Investing outflow well above AVGO's 23.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 89.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
103.51%
Issuance growth of 103.51% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
13.46%
We have some buyback growth while AVGO is negative at -107.07%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.