205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.80%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -9.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
28.38%
Some D&A expansion while AVGO is negative at -0.37%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-184.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AVGO stands at 17.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.19%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AVGO is 18.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-361.36%
Negative yoy inventory while AVGO is 26.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.47%
Negative yoy usage while AVGO is 68.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-147.45%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -33.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-40.03%
Negative yoy CFO while AVGO is 7.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.11%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -44.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while AVGO stands at 45.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
60.29%
Below 50% of AVGO's 333.33%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.42%
Investing outflow well above AVGO's 23.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.38%
Negative yoy issuance while AVGO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-75.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -107.07%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.