PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
308.03%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -9.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AVGO at -0.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-13.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AVGO stands at 17.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while AVGO is 38.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-34.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AVGO is 18.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth while AVGO is negative at -9.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-56.14%
Negative yoy inventory while AVGO is 26.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while AVGO is negative at -354.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-804.76%
Negative yoy usage while AVGO is 68.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2998.00%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -33.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.72%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVGO's 7.23%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
8.33%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -44.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
84.18%
Acquisition growth of 84.18% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-165.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while AVGO stands at 45.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-15.46%
We reduce yoy sales while AVGO is 333.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
49700.00%
We have some outflow growth while AVGO is negative at -176.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
146.91%
Investing outflow well above AVGO's 23.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
11.58%
Debt repayment well below AVGO's 89.41%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-3.52%
Negative yoy issuance while AVGO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
27.99%
We have some buyback growth while AVGO is negative at -107.07%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.