205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.21%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -9.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.68%
Some D&A expansion while AVGO is negative at -0.37%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
1300.00%
Well above AVGO's 17.96% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
579.12%
Well above AVGO's 18.76% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.67%
Negative yoy inventory while AVGO is 26.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
718.42%
Growth well above AVGO's 68.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-114.77%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -33.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
70.49%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVGO's 7.23%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
12.64%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -44.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.03%
Negative yoy purchasing while AVGO stands at 45.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-10.17%
We reduce yoy sales while AVGO is 333.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3150.00%
We have some outflow growth while AVGO is negative at -176.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-410.24%
We reduce yoy invests while AVGO stands at 23.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 89.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
-55.61%
Negative yoy issuance while AVGO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-89.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -107.07%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.