205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.10%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -45.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.62%
D&A growth well above INTC's 1.16%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-57.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 5.83%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.59%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -75.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.63%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 381.07%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
272.97%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -208.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-841.00%
Negative yoy while INTC is 94.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-43.00%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -2.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
8.77%
Lower CapEx growth vs. INTC's 36.33%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.91%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. INTC's 70.78%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-27.75%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -35.45%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.65%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 162.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.67%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 97.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.66%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.