PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.16%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.56%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.09%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
600.00%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -165.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.53%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 172.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth well above INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
16.46%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -53.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-2988.89%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 311.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.75%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of INTC's 129.79%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
11.22%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -50.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -33.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
13.68%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 36622.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
7.96%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -197.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
64.29%
We slightly raise equity while INTC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
34.30%
We have some buyback growth while INTC is negative at -0.40%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.