205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-70.63%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 47.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.29%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 3.37%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-12.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 105.49%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 115.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.28%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 77.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -12.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
102.19%
Well above INTC's 45.56%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-34.43%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 82.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
26.20%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 32.85%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
56.46%
Purchases well above INTC's 11.54%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
30.23%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -12.72%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -48.45%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-34.55%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 57.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while INTC is negative at -966.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-35.04%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 131.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-63.45%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.