205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.22%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -21.88%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.03%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -3.04%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
70.93%
Well above INTC's 79.17% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-153.57%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 449.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
60.21%
Growth well above INTC's 63.32%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
686.67%
Well above INTC's 785.29%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
62.09%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 55.73%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
2.79%
Lower CapEx growth vs. INTC's 6.10%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-74.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 17.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.73%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x INTC's 9.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -4.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-188.64%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 26.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.86%
Stock issuance far above INTC's 32.42%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
13.42%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 75.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.