205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1429.41%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -163.28%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.92%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Well above INTC's 32.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-6.00%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 21.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
80.61%
Less working capital growth vs. INTC's 199.70%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
46.79%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. INTC's 139.57%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-86.74%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -64.87%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth well above INTC's 107.91%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
250.00%
Growth well above INTC's 197.29%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-23.08%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -11.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
121.91%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of INTC's 795.24%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-11.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 34.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
50.96%
Acquisition growth of 50.96% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-55.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -454.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-19.81%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 21.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -644.01%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x INTC's 89.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
5.56%
We slightly raise equity while INTC is negative at -99.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-147.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.