205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.92%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 566.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.72%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -3.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
1083.33%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -1.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.13%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -15.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-68.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -78.01%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-60.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -141.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-243.24%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 28.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.00%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -99.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-160.00%
Negative yoy while INTC is 3.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
49.73%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 18.29%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-370.83%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 3.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-154.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 62.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-73.59%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -79.21%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-769.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -51.91%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.95%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. INTC's 11800.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-0.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -2017.72%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.