205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
68.30%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-0.61%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
625.00%
Well above INTC's 322.22% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-7.25%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-10.48%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 91.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-339.68%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 226.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
64.84%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -5.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-251.35%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 643.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.86%
Growth well above INTC's 51.48%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.33%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of INTC's 59.45%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-41.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 10.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. INTC's 283.52%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-70.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 24.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.18%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -24.07%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -151.81%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
18.89%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 16.39%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-91.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -134.78%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-73.75%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.