PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 47.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.96%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
155.56%
Well above INTC's 45.08% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-5.33%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -8.22%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
131.94%
Well above INTC's 33.65% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
81.25%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -416.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
70.00%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 105.65%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
52.78%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -36.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
261.70%
Growth well above INTC's 69.91%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
833.33%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -10933.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
70.77%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 21.37%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-27.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -5.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
27.84%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -75.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
58.49%
Purchases well above INTC's 25.01%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-69.92%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 4.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-24.74%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 259.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-168.39%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 39.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.75%
Issuance growth of 1.75% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-1.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 31.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.