205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -26.48%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.08%
D&A growth well above INTC's 2.61%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-171.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 93.54%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
18.18%
SBC growth well above INTC's 7.60%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-214.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -151.53%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-146.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -44.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
440.00%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 13.13%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-1000.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -111.11%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-1161.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -210.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
117.19%
Well above INTC's 9.33%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-61.47%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -42.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.04%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 8.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 52.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-43.97%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 5.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
14.60%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x INTC's 3.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
148.72%
Growth well above INTC's 98.64%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-147.97%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 29.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.45%
Issuance growth of 68.45% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
1.91%
We have some buyback growth while INTC is negative at -5.73%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.