205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.25%
Net income growth at 75-90% of INTC's 44.87%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 8.12%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-54.05%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.28%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 7.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
34.11%
Less working capital growth vs. INTC's 149.48%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-10.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -85.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-276.47%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -141.98%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
49.57%
AP growth well above INTC's 91.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
99.28%
Growth well above INTC's 147.34%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
81.82%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -123.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
67.75%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 55.76%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-3.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -5.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.51%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -8.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
64.84%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -0.90%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-302.63%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 4800.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
362.95%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -55.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-55.83%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-3.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -263.64%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.