205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.94%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 18.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
0.33%
Less D&A growth vs. INTC's 1.29%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
52.63%
Well above INTC's 22.10% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-19.48%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -7.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
165.88%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -75.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.45%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -1600.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
76.67%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -3.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
18.64%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -2262.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
18200.00%
Growth well above INTC's 13.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
130.00%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -205.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
78.45%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.40%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-28.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 13.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
28.75%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. INTC's 76.43%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-69.64%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 27.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-68.16%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-18.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -99.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-147.76%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 76.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-45.60%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
9.83%
We have some buyback growth while INTC is negative at -100.34%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.