205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.12%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 10.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.97%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -1.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
185.19%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -152.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-3.23%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
49.40%
Less working capital growth vs. INTC's 105.21%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
430.95%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -375.76%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-371.43%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 10.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
162.50%
AP growth well above INTC's 122.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-82.87%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 75.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-517.39%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -220.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.03%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-21.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 8.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
21.36%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -190.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-33.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -11.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
15.29%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -9.69%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
68.13%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. INTC's 48500.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-28.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -93.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.88%
Issuance growth of 105.88% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 11.54%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.